Tuesday, October 22, 2013

Sola Gratia, part 1

 Getting back on track, we'll now take a look at Sola Gratia, the third of the Five Solas of the Reformation.

Sola Gratia means simply "Grace Alone," and the doctrine teaches that we are saved by God's Grace (alone), and not by anything we do. Grace, by definition, is unearned.

This is where some confusion might arise, specifically between Sola Gratia and Sola Fide. "Wait a minute" you might say. "I thought we were saved by our faith, and isn't faith something we do?"
The answer is in Ephesians 2:8-9, one of the most popular proof-texts for Sola Gratia:
"For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, not of works, lest anyone should boast"
As we see in the passage, we are saved by grace alone, through faith alone. Faith has been described as the pipes or conduits through which God's Grace flows into us. In this way, Sola Fide and Sola Gratia work together, in harmony.

But that still leaves the question: "Isn't faith something we do?" because if it is, then we should get some of the credit for salvation, since faith was on our part. Right? Well, looking back at the previous passage, we see that this saving faith (along with the Grace preceding it)  is "not of ourselves; it is the gift of God." Yes, faith is something we do, but the ability to have that faith is given to us by God as part of the salvation process. So we see that every aspect of our salvation, including faith, is a gift of God's grace.

Why is it this way? Why don't we contribute to our own salvation? Because we couldn't even if we wanted to. Sola Gratia goes hand in hand with Total Depravity: if we are dead in our sins and trespasses, and enslaved to sin, and don't seek God, then clearly we are unable to save ourselves, much less worthy of being saved. Thus, it is not only logical, but necessary that God do all the work of salvation in us.

Now the question is: what does the scripture say? Does scripture support the doctrine of Sola Gratia? The answer is yes.

Ephesians 2:1-10 says:
"And you were dead in the trespasses and sins in which you once walked, following the course of this world, following the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that is now at work in the sons of disobedience— among whom we all once lived in the passions of our flesh, carrying out the desires of the body and the mind, and were by nature children of wrath, like the rest of mankind. But God, being rich in mercy, because of the great love with which he loved us,  even when we were dead in our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ—by grace you have been saved— and raised us up with him and seated us with him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus, so that in the coming ages he might show the immeasurable riches of his grace in kindness toward us in Christ Jesus. For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast.  For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them."
This passage shows clearly how we, before salvation, were unable to save ourselves or to contribute to our salvation in any way, and therefore, that salvation is by Grace. This will be repeated over and over as we look at the following passages.

Acts 15:11 says:
"But we believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved in the same manner as they."
Acts 18:27 says:
"And when he desired to cross to Achaia, the brethren wrote, exhorting the disciples to receive him; and when he arrived, he greatly helped those who had believed through grace;"
Romans 3:23-24 says:
"for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, being justified freely by His grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus,"
  Romans 5 verses 15 & 21 say:
"But the free gift is not like the offense. For if by the one man’s offense many died, much more the grace of God and the gift by the grace of the one Man, Jesus Christ, abounded to many... so that as sin reigned in death, even so grace might reign through righteousness to eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord."
 Romans 11:6 says:
"And if by grace, then it is no longer of works; otherwise grace is no longer grace. But if it is of works, it is no longer grace; otherwise work is no longer work."
Ephesians 1:7 says:
"In Him we have redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of His grace"
2 Thessalonians 2:16 says:
"Now may our Lord Jesus Christ Himself, and our God and Father, who has loved us and given us everlasting consolation and good hope by grace,"
2 Timothy 1:9 says:
"who has saved us and called us with a holy calling, not according to our works, but according to His own purpose and grace which was given to us in Christ Jesus before time began,"
Titus 2:11 says:
"For the grace of God that brings salvation has appeared to all men,"
Titus 3:7 says:
"that having been justified by His grace we should become heirs according to the hope of eternal life."
These are just a few of the many verses which tell us that salvation is a gift of God's grace, and of His grace alone. It should be clear by now that Sola Gratia is a doctrine founded firmly in scripture, and one which no Christian could reasonably object to. However, as we will find out in part two of this post, there are objections to Sola Gratia, and we'll see what we can do to deal with them.

Until then, God's Grace be with you!

17 comments:

  1. ["Looking back at the previous passage, we see that this saving faith (along with the Grace preceding it) is "not of ourselves; it is the gift of God."] Faith is not "the gift" spoken of in Ephesians 2:8-9; SALVATION is the gift. Don't take my word for it; even John Calvin said of this text: "He does not mean that faith is the gift of God, but that salvation is given to us by God, or, that we obtain it by the gift of God." (Calvin's Commentaries, Vol. 11, 145). I have not studied Greek much, but A.T. Robertson (a NT Greek scholar) commented on this passage: "Grace" is God's part, "faith" ours. And that [it] (kai touto) is neuter, not feminine taute, and so refers not to piistis [faith] or to charis [grace] (feminine also), but to the act of being saved by grace conditioned on faith on our part. (A.T. Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament).

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't think there's necessarily a disagreement here.
    Sure, faith is on man's part, but the ability to have that faith is given to us by God when He regenerates us, which is part of salvation, and thus, a gift, and not of ourselves. Perhaps I could've better-worded my original point. In any case, this view does not contradict with either of your quotes, at least, as far as I can tell.

    Maybe I just have a different one of Calvin's commentaries, but I'm looking at the precise Ephesians passage and I'm not seeing the part you quoted. Out of curiosity, do you actually have a copy of Calvin's Commentaries, or did you look it up or something?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You know what, I didn't word that part correctly. I'm changing it now...
      Thanks for pointing that out!

      Delete
    2. Okay, I found the part in Calvin's commentaries. I believe you left out some important and revealing context.
      "And here we must advert to a very common error in the interpretation of this passage. Many persons restrict the word gift to faith alone. But Paul is only repeating in other words the former sentiment. His meaning is, not that faith is the gift of God, but that salvation is given to us by God, or, that we obtain it by the gift of God."
      Calvin is not refuting the statement that faith is a gift from God. Calvin is refuting the statement that faith is THE gift of God, and that faith is the only word "gift" refers to. Calvin points out that salvation (of which faith is a part) is what "gift" is referring to.

      Delete
    3. "...the ability to have that faith is given to us by God when He regenerates us, which is part of salvation, and thus, a gift, and not of ourselves." Herein lies the disagreement- You believe faith is imparted to us at (after) salvation; I believe faith PRECEDES salvation: "Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved; you and your household." (Acts 16:31). Belief comes before salvation, Faith is a condition of being saved.

      I do not own a copy of Calvin's Commentaries. I came across this during my research and study of these verses in Ephesians 2:8-9.

      Delete
  3. I don't believe that Salvation precedes faith. I believe that regeneration precedes faith, which is just one step in the salvation process. I would agree that we are not fully saved until after we believe. However, nobody believes unless they've been regenerated, and God only regenerates those whom He intends to save. Thus, regeneration is, undeniably, part of salvation, even if it's not the whole deal.
    We've already talked about this before. Because we're totally depraved, God must change something in us first to make us able to believe. It's not "getting saved twice" or "getting saved before you can get saved," it's just part of the salvation process. Either way, it's an act of God's grace.

    Well, I would just be careful to only quote Calvin from the source material. In my own studies, I've seen that people (especially on the internet) oftentimes misquote Calvin or take him out of context. I'm not saying that's what you did, I'm just giving warning to the wise from my own personal experience.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm sorry for asking this as I'm sure you've posted this already (I am using my phone rather than the computer at the moment and searching through prior posts is a bit awkward on this contaption), but what Scriture references do you have to back up the theory of regeneration?

      Delete
    2. *contraption *Scripture...sheesh! See what I mean? Bumblong thumbs...

      Delete
    3. The Bible says that (pre-salvation) we are slaves to sin (Romans 6:17), hard of heart (Romans 2:5), spiritually blind (John 9:39; 1 John 2:11), that we do not receive and cannot understand the things of God (1 Corinthians 2:14), and, as the Ephesians 2 passage says, spiritually dead in sin.
      Therefore, based on these scriptures, it is logically necessary that God do something to remedy those symptoms: giving us our spiritual freedom, softening our hearts (Ezekiel 36:26), giving us our spiritual sight and life, and making us able to receive and understand His Word, before and in order that we can have faith. I believe this "regeneration" (if that is the correct term) is what is being referred to in John 3:5, Titus 3:5, and 2 Corinthians 5:17.

      Delete
    4. All I see in those three verses in regards to "regeneration" is the new birth...salvation. Nothing about being changed before. And in context isn't Ezekiel 36:26 talking about the nation of Israel? In which case, they still have to repent in order to be restored. I'm honestly not trying to be difficult; just trying to get a grasp of this concept of God's need to change us BEFORE we can be believe. Some of the other doctrines, I can at least understand how you might arrive at those conclusions. With this, I'm just not seeing it.

      Delete
  4. You need to understand the logical progression. IF we are Totally Depraved to the point of not being able to have faith, as my first slew of verses pointed out, then it simply stands to reason that God must change something within us BEFORE we can have faith to receive him. This "regeneration" as I've been putting it, what many (including myself) believe those three "rebirth" verses to be talking about.

    If you read the Ezekiel passage in context, God says that he will change the Israelite's hearts and give them His spirit FIRST, and then, as a result, they will turn from all of their wicked ways. They change their ways because they get restored, not the other way around.

    Well, I'm not trying to be difficult either. :) I'm trying to do a good job of explaining it. Look back at Jesus' example of being "Born of the Spirit" in John 3.
    In the same way a mother does not need (nor can obtain) a baby's consent to give birth to it, God does not need our faith to orchestrate our Spiritual birth. A baby must be born before it can accept it's parents, and so we must be spiritually born before we can accept Christ. Does that make any sense?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think I understand what you mean; it would be necessary for me to accept the belief of Total Depravity in order for me to believe that God must change us before we can be saved. But since I don't believe that we are so spiritually dead in our trespasses that we cannot respond to God prior to Salvation (I shared my reasoning elsewhere on your blog), it would not be possible for me to understand this doctrine. Is that right?

      I've never thought of the spiritual birth as being dependent upon my willingness. Good point! I've copied your words from the final two paragraphs here and will definitely be pondering on this. I'm sure this topic will spawn some great conversation in our family.

      I've always cited those verses in John 3 as proof of eternal security. Once you are born, you cannot be "unborn". Once we are born again, we cannot be spiritually unborn.

      Thanks for your patience with me.

      Delete
  5. Yeah, I guess if you don't believe in total depravity, then there's no reason to accept what I'm saying in regards to God changing us pre-faith/salvation. So I could see why, based on that, you wouldn't believe it.

    That's cool, I didn't know your whole family discussed this stuff. I mean, these comment conversations. If you really want something good to discuss regarding Reformed theology (from our side of the fence), I would recommend James White. He's written books in response to Norman Geisler, and he debates a lot, from what I hear.

    Yep, that's a good point too. You would have to be "unborn," and Christ would have to somehow "un-atone" for you, among other things. That's why I believe in Perseverance of the Saints.

    No problem! Any time!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Also, James White has studied theology... whereas I have not.

      Delete
  6. We do discuss, among other things, reformed theology and your posts here have helped us to understand the doctrines a bit better. Our constant prayer is that the Lord will show us TRUTH, even if that means taking us outside the theological box we've (spiritually) "grown up" in.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I really like all the biblical input you put into this. Also, I like the point you made about every aspect of our salvation being a gift of God's grace! So good.

    ReplyDelete

Please, feel free to post a comment! I very much enjoy hearing other people's opinions, regardless of whether or not they are in agreement of my own. Just please remember to keep comments kind and respectful, otherwise they may be deleted!